The True Cost of Technical Debt: A Calculator for Leaders
The True Cost of Technical Debt: A Calculator for Leaders
Last year I sat in a board meeting where a director asked, "What is our technical debt costing us?" The CTO said, "It's hard to quantify." The director moved on. A $2M problem was dismissed in 15 seconds because nobody had a number.
I don't blame the CTO. Quantifying tech debt in dollars is genuinely hard. But "hard" is not "impossible," and the cost of not having a number is that debt never gets prioritized against revenue-generating work.
I built a calculator. It's not perfect. No model of a complex system is. But it gives you a defensible number that's close enough to drive decisions. I've used it at three companies, and each time it turned "we should probably do something about tech debt" into a funded initiative with executive sponsorship.
The Four Cost Categories
Technical debt costs money in four ways. Most teams only think about the first one.
Category 1: Delivery Tax
The most visible cost. How much longer does everything take because of the current state of the codebase?
Delivery Tax = (Actual Hours - Clean-Code Hours) x Hourly Rate x Annual Occurrences
Example:
- Adding a new API endpoint takes 16 hours (should take 6)
- Overhead per endpoint: 10 hours
- Hourly rate (fully loaded): $95
- New endpoints per year: 48
Delivery Tax = 10 x $95 x 48 = $45,600/year
Do this calculation for your 5 most common types of engineering work. Add them up.
Category 2: Incident Cost
What does your debt cost when things break?
Incident Cost = (Incidents/Year) x (Avg Response Hours x Engineers x Hourly Rate)
+ (Customer Impact per Incident)
+ (Revenue Lost per Hour of Downtime x Avg Downtime Hours)
Example:
- Debt-related incidents per year: 18
- Average response: 4 hours, 2 engineers, $95/hr = $760/incident
- Customer impact (support tickets, goodwill): $500/incident
- Revenue loss: $200/hr x 2 hrs avg downtime = $400/incident
Incident Cost = 18 x ($760 + $500 + $400) = $29,880/year
Category 3: Opportunity Cost
This is the hardest to calculate and the most significant. What features aren't you building because engineers are fighting the codebase?
Opportunity Cost = (Hours Spent on Debt Workarounds) x (Revenue per Engineering Hour)
To calculate Revenue per Engineering Hour:
Annual Revenue / Total Engineering Hours = Revenue per Engineering Hour
Example:
- Annual revenue: $12M
- Total engineering hours: 52,000 (25 engineers x 2,080 hrs)
- Revenue per engineering hour: $230
- Hours lost to debt annually: 6,240 (30% of one team's capacity)
Opportunity Cost = 6,240 x $230 = $1,435,200/year
I was wrong about this category for a long time. I dismissed opportunity cost as too speculative to include in business cases. Then a CFO told me: "We calculate opportunity cost for every other capital allocation decision. Why would engineering be different?" She was right. The number doesn't need to be exact. It needs to be directionally correct and consistently calculated.
Category 4: Talent Cost
Engineers leave bad codebases. Replacing engineers is expensive.
Talent Cost = (Debt-Related Attrition) x (Cost to Replace)
Cost to Replace = Recruiting ($15-30K)
+ Onboarding (3-6 months at reduced productivity)
+ Lost Institutional Knowledge (incalculable but real)
Conservative estimate per departure: $75,000
Example:
- 2 engineers left last year citing "codebase frustration"
- Talent Cost = 2 x $75,000 = $150,000/year
Check your exit interview data. If engineers mention technical frustration, codebase quality, or "wanting to work with modern tools," that's debt-driven attrition.
The Total Cost Calculator
Here's the full calculation template:
TECHNICAL DEBT COST CALCULATOR
==============================
1. DELIVERY TAX
Common Task A: ___ hrs overhead x $___/hr x ___/year = $______
Common Task B: ___ hrs overhead x $___/hr x ___/year = $______
Common Task C: ___ hrs overhead x $___/hr x ___/year = $______
Common Task D: ___ hrs overhead x $___/hr x ___/year = $______
Common Task E: ___ hrs overhead x $___/hr x ___/year = $______
Delivery Tax Total: $______
2. INCIDENT COST
Incidents/year: ___
Avg response cost: $______
Avg customer impact: $______
Avg revenue loss: $______
Incident Cost Total: $______
3. OPPORTUNITY COST
Hours lost to debt/year: ______
Revenue per engineering hour: $______
Opportunity Cost Total: $______
4. TALENT COST
Debt-related departures/year: ___
Cost per departure: $______
Talent Cost Total: $______
================================
TOTAL ANNUAL COST OF DEBT: $______
Gathering the Data
You're probably thinking: "I don't have most of these numbers." You're right. Here's how to get them in two weeks.
Week 1: Developer Survey
Send a 5-question survey to your engineering team:
- What percentage of your time is spent on work that would be unnecessary if the codebase were better? (Give ranges: 0-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40%, 40%+)
- List the top 3 areas of the codebase that slow you down most.
- How much longer do common tasks take than they should? (Give specific task examples)
- Have you considered leaving due to codebase frustration? (Yes/No/Somewhat)
- What's the single highest-impact improvement we could make?
This takes engineers 5 minutes and gives you data for categories 1, 3, and 4.
Week 2: Incident Analysis
Pull your incident data for the past 12 months. For each incident:
- Was the root cause related to code quality or architecture? (vs. external factors, configuration, etc.)
- How many engineer-hours were spent on response?
- What was the customer impact?
- Was there any revenue impact?
This gives you category 2 data.
Presenting the Number
When you present the total, use ranges instead of precise figures. This is more honest and more credible.
ANNUAL COST OF TECHNICAL DEBT: $1.2M - $1.8M
Conservative estimate: $1.2M
(Only delivery tax + incident cost)
Mid-range estimate: $1.5M
(Adds opportunity cost with conservative assumptions)
Upper estimate: $1.8M
(Includes talent cost and less conservative opportunity cost)
RECOMMENDED INVESTMENT: $200K (2 engineers, 1 quarter)
PROJECTED ANNUAL SAVINGS: $400K-$600K
PAYBACK PERIOD: 4-6 months
Ranges show you've thought about uncertainty. Precise numbers invite nitpicking.
The Quarterly Review Template
Run this calculation quarterly. Track the trend.
| Quarter | Delivery Tax | Incident Cost | Opportunity Cost | Talent Cost | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2025 | $38K | $22K | $310K | $0 | $370K |
| Q2 2025 | $42K | $28K | $340K | $75K | $485K |
| Q3 2025 | $46K | $25K | $360K | $0 | $431K |
| Q4 2025 | $51K | $32K | $390K | $75K | $548K |
That upward trend is your most powerful argument. "Debt is costing us 48% more than it was a year ago. It will cost even more next year if we don't invest now."
The Contrarian Take
Most engineering leaders try to be precise about debt cost. They want to calculate it to the dollar. That pursuit of precision is itself a form of waste.
You don't need precision. You need magnitude. If your debt costs somewhere between $1M and $2M annually, and the remediation costs $200K, the investment is obvious regardless of where exactly in that range you fall. Spend your energy getting the magnitude right and the remediation plan solid, not debating whether the delivery tax is $45K or $52K.
The calculator isn't meant to be an exact model of reality. It's meant to turn a vague feeling into a concrete conversation. "We have a lot of tech debt" gets ignored. "$1.5M per year" gets a meeting with the CFO.
Give your leadership a number. Make it defensible. Let them make the decision. That's your job.
$ ls ./related
Explore by topic